Abstract: Socrates was and is one of the most influential figures in the history of Western philosophy. Yet it remains an open question just what the real, historical Socrates stood for: he wrote nothing, and none even of our most ancient sources can probably be relied upon to give us anything like an accurate picture of his ideas and methods. As if to fill the gap, successive individual philosophers and philosophical traditions—from Plato to Nietzsche and beyond—construct a range of different Socrateses, to serve either as a model for emulation or as a target of attack. Nevertheless, the single most vivid picture of Socrates is that provided by Plato, who was his immediate philosophical successor, and who gave the character ‘Socrates’ the leading role in the majority of his fictional dialogues. What is this Socrates like, and does he have any use for us? http://research.ncl.ac.uk/histos/documents/1998.09RoweUsesandDisadvantagesofSocrates216229.pdf
…“His philosophy is not a guide that you should think like him, it’s a guide that you should think for yourself.”
The gist of The Myth of Sisyphus on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Sisyphus
The entire essay:
O CT OB ER, 1 8 9 5. IS LIFE WORTH LIVING? Read more here.
WHEN Mr. Mallock's book with this title appeared some fifteen years ago, the jocose answer that " it depends on the liver" had great currency in the newspapers. The answer that I propose to give today cannot be jocose. In the words of one of Shakespeare's prologues, " I come no more to make you laugh; things now that bear a weighty and a serious brow, sad, high, and working, full of state and woe,"
At the 9:15 mark, the interviewer asks about the “practical use of your sort of philosophy to a man who wants to know how to conduct himself”. Also, a simple answer form Bertrand Russell on what philosophy is: Science is what we know, Philosophy is what we don't know..
Slavoj Zizek on how Belief Functions Today. https://youtu.be/xCD3hg6OEQw